After The He 219....
This is my first post here... I'd like to say hello to you guys. Saw the poll and thought I would post my vote and write here what I would like to see as the next candidate for a WOP model.
My first choice is the Messerschmitt 109. I know there is a payware 109F model out there, and there are some very good freeware 109s of various marks but they have a basic VC (except for the payware 109F which I believe has a good VC).
A WOP 109 from the G right through to the definite K model, with VCs and flight dynamics as close to the real thing is what I am suggesting. WOP have very good standards, excellent, I have the FW long nose and I love it.
I have read lots of accounts of the pilots who flew them and also of the Finns who flew them till the 1950's. The accounts by the Finns are the most interesting ones to read- more so as they knew how to fly the 109s better than the germans (in the late stages of the 2nd WW, the german pilots were not getting adequate training on the 109) Proper training was the key here. The finn pilots say in their accounts that the 109 was easy to fly provided the right training was given. Lots of accounts by other people who said it was a hard plane to fly were proved wrong.
My second choice is the Me262, as there are new build 262s flying now.
Well here's my input for now.
My first choice is the Messerschmitt 109. I know there is a payware 109F model out there, and there are some very good freeware 109s of various marks but they have a basic VC (except for the payware 109F which I believe has a good VC).
A WOP 109 from the G right through to the definite K model, with VCs and flight dynamics as close to the real thing is what I am suggesting. WOP have very good standards, excellent, I have the FW long nose and I love it.
I have read lots of accounts of the pilots who flew them and also of the Finns who flew them till the 1950's. The accounts by the Finns are the most interesting ones to read- more so as they knew how to fly the 109s better than the germans (in the late stages of the 2nd WW, the german pilots were not getting adequate training on the 109) Proper training was the key here. The finn pilots say in their accounts that the 109 was easy to fly provided the right training was given. Lots of accounts by other people who said it was a hard plane to fly were proved wrong.
My second choice is the Me262, as there are new build 262s flying now.
Well here's my input for now.
-
- Airman First Class
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 13 May 2005, 19:01
- Contact:
- Boandlgramer
- Senior Airman
- Posts: 137
- Joined: 26 Aug 2005, 14:42
- Location: Oberbayern. European Union
- Contact:
I would want that Bf109 even only for the sound.
Listen to this flyby of the real thing:
http://users.telenet.be/pjd5212/data/Bf109whine.mp3
Listen to this flyby of the real thing:
http://users.telenet.be/pjd5212/data/Bf109whine.mp3
PJD
After the he-219..
Well, the fighter Jocks are vocal..grin.
But how about a Lockheed Hudson, which served in evry theater in just about evry capacity, and with most nationalities, even the japanese had a copy..
Alex
But how about a Lockheed Hudson, which served in evry theater in just about evry capacity, and with most nationalities, even the japanese had a copy..
Alex
Shockwave sets the standard. Now others are following.
We that purchase Shockwave aircraft demand quality and as real as it gets aircraft. There seems to be a old guy in town that is starting to match Shockwaves quality and reality. Sky Unlimited just released their P-38 before Aeroplane Heaven did and it is a peach. It looks like Shockwave quality thru and thru. This one Shockwave won't have to do.
Regards
Jib01/02
Regards
Jib01/02
Now running the following...
Pentium 4 HT @ 3.06ghz
2Gig of OCZ 667mhz ram
GeForce 7950GT with 512mb DDR3
160Gig Sata drive
Pentium 4 HT @ 3.06ghz
2Gig of OCZ 667mhz ram
GeForce 7950GT with 512mb DDR3
160Gig Sata drive
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 41 guests