Page 1 of 2
PC GAMER - March 2007 says...
Posted: 03 Feb 2007, 22:35
by Scott - A2A
Andy Mahood dedicated the entire, full-page simulation column to BOB2.
“Toss in some improved AI…and a new multiskin component…and you’ll end up with a top-of-the-line WWII combat flight simulation that can hold its own with anything on the 2007 radar screen.â€Â
“BOB2’s padlocking system remains one of the best in the businessâ€Â
“If you have the right stuff, a twisting and turning engagement between the nimble Spitfire and the quicker Bf109 can produce some of the most amazing aerial dogfighting action you’ll ever witness in a PC Combat-sim.â€Â
- Scott
Posted: 03 Feb 2007, 22:53
by spitfireace
And next month theres a review in the main spanish pc game magazine........
Posted: 04 Feb 2007, 00:22
by Buddye
Scott, great news. Can someone please post a complete text for us to review when it is avaiable.
Could it mean that determination, hard work, and a outstanding community does pay off in the long run.
Posted: 04 Feb 2007, 07:35
by spitfireace
Buddye wrote:Scott, great news. Can someone please post a complete text for us to review when it is avaiable.
Could it mean that determination, hard work, and a outstanding community does pay off in the long run.
Its gotta be......
Posted: 06 Feb 2007, 05:47
by borton
“Toss in some improved AI…and a new multiskin component…and you’ll end up with a top-of-the-line WWII combat flight simulation that can hold its own with anything on the 2007 radar screen.â€Â
I beg his pardon! What's wrong with the present AI and the multiskins?
Or am I misreading him?
Posted: 06 Feb 2007, 07:03
by Bader
I imagine that the review is all about 2.05 and current Multiskin. They aren't too shabby, afterall.
PCPilot is a good read. I'm going to search out a copy.. it's available online.
Posted: 14 Feb 2007, 00:55
by Aloid
Andy's comments pushed me over the edge on buying BOB2. I'm glad to see the sim supported so well that it has a chance to mature.
I hope to get mine in the mail soon so I can witness first hand what I'm seeing in all the great screen shots and movies.
Hopefully I'll have a few of my own to add at some point.
This will give me another reason to watch The Battle of Britain another hundred times...
Aloid
Posted: 20 Feb 2007, 22:47
by Buddye
Has anyone got their hands on the PC Gamer review that they can post for our review as yet?
Was it the March PC Gamer?
Posted: 21 Feb 2007, 13:15
by Buddye
Got it
Posted: 21 Feb 2007, 13:50
by borton
And yet we still find things to criticise
although it is getting harder all the time.
Posted: 21 Feb 2007, 14:10
by JamesB
I don't think so Borton, thats about as good as it gets, he does not seem to have criticised anything. His reference to ading a bit of improved AI is a reference to 2.05. Thats about as glowing a report as we could have asked if we had payed!
Posted: 21 Feb 2007, 14:42
by borton
No, not him, James. I meant us, the users - more specifically the testers!
Posted: 21 Feb 2007, 17:21
by JamesB
Hehe, there is always something to do better. We do at least have a healthy comunity, we are able to see the problems.
Posted: 21 Feb 2007, 20:20
by IncendiaryLemon
JamesB wrote:Hehe, there is always something to do better. We do at least have a healthy comunity, we are able to see the problems.
Perspective is absolutely essential
Posted: 22 Feb 2007, 11:01
by Buddye
Opps, sorry guys Scott just told me I can post the Andy Mahood PC Gamer March 2007. I guess I broke the law sorry.
He took the post/link down for me.
So anyone that read it please forget it for me.