Hey guys,
I've a really modest PC rig but I've got the civ mustang running quite smooth within FSX SE. I also bought the Bonanza, C182 and B17 and that's also the order they perform fps wise.
Do you have any experience how the Cub's performing under the same circumstances?
Thanks in advance,
Zacke
Cub vs. Mustang - sim performance (fps)?
-
- Technical Sergeant
- Posts: 899
- Joined: 30 Nov 2014, 19:07
- Location: US
- Contact:
Re: Cub vs. Mustang - sim performance (fps)?
The Cub will be just fine if you can run these others with no issues.
Re: Cub vs. Mustang - sim performance (fps)?
Thanks for your reply.
But maybe I wasn't clear enough: The Mustang is performing quite good with my rig and settings. The other mentioned ones not so smooth. For me the question is how's the cub relative to the civilian Mustang?
Thanks again,
Zacke
But maybe I wasn't clear enough: The Mustang is performing quite good with my rig and settings. The other mentioned ones not so smooth. For me the question is how's the cub relative to the civilian Mustang?
Thanks again,
Zacke
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13803
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Cub vs. Mustang - sim performance (fps)?
Hi Zacke,
The Cub is a comparatively basic aircraft and the Accu-Sim version has a fairly simple virtual cockpit with few click-spots. The performance fps-wise should exceed that of the P-51 Civilian, and it'll certainly outperform the C182 and Bonanza in terms of sim performance, if not 'performance performance'.
Thanks,
Nick
The Cub is a comparatively basic aircraft and the Accu-Sim version has a fairly simple virtual cockpit with few click-spots. The performance fps-wise should exceed that of the P-51 Civilian, and it'll certainly outperform the C182 and Bonanza in terms of sim performance, if not 'performance performance'.
Thanks,
Nick
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests