The A2A Simulations Community

"Come share your passion for flight"
It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 2:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 5:03 pm 
Offline
Airman First Class

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:53 am
Posts: 92
Very nice.
When can I throw my money at you?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 7:10 pm 
Offline
Senior Airman

Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:48 pm
Posts: 101
Location: EX- Christchurch now called "Wobblyville" New Zealand
Perfecto :shock: , this is going to be a lotta fun ...who needs the manual after that in-depth video :D

_________________
http://www.nzff.org
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 7:13 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:55 pm
Posts: 373
Location: O-K-L-A-H-O-M-A
Instead of "RTM"... it'll be "WTV" (watch the video!)

Cheers!

Bud

_________________
Buddy Morgan

ImageImageImage

i5 2500k - Asus P8P67 Pro - G.Skill Ripjaw 8GB - EVGA GTX 570 Fermi


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 8:26 pm 
Offline
Senior Airman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:23 pm
Posts: 182
Sounds almost exactly like the Accu-sim P-40 when in flight..........

_________________
ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 10:49 pm 
Offline
Airman

Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 12
Scott, you and your team look to have put together one hell of a model. Very impressive.
And the LOD you've incorporated in, makes it very appealing.

It's a beautiful model! Fantastic job everyone!!
Your efforts are definitely on my wish list.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:25 am 
Offline
Airman Basic

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:47 am
Posts: 2
wallydog wrote:
Drool... I really enjoy these videos and love the way each one of these goes deep into the guts of the plane and accusim. A lot of care goes into making these for the community and customers and it shows. Can't wait for the release. That flyby with that distinct whistle put a huge grin on my face.


I also smiled when I heard that. A definte buy.

jime


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 3:06 am 
Offline
Senior Airman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 7:28 pm
Posts: 104
Speaking of the whistle, check out how loud it is in this clip. :shock:

http://youtu.be/Ys7QqNTASWk

_________________
My Guide On How To Fix Your X-52's Rudder!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 4:23 am 
Offline
Technical Sergeant

Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 946
Location: Holland, near EHTW
636Castle wrote:
Speaking of the whistle, check out how loud it is in this clip. :shock:

http://youtu.be/Ys7QqNTASWk

;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X-kgOn5G6Q

_________________
Lukas
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:36 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:48 am
Posts: 344
Location: Finland
Nice new features... the electric gauges that actually need voltage to operate (even if they weren't used to measure voltage itself). Should the fuel gauges work that way too? I saw two of them on the floor that had a fuel readout prior to turning on battery. If they should be electric gauges, better fix them prior to release.

___

How about the oil pressures? They rise slowly and rise quite high, to around 120 psi, (even at 20 deg C). With P-40 ...just around 40 psi (at a lower 15 deg C oil temperature). At with Spitfire, I only get high idle pressure at sub zero. -10 deg C and I get around 120 psi at very low idle and it drops to near normal oil pressure by the time oil warms to 0 deg C. Thus if I start it at 0 deg C ambient, it's about as if I had started it warm (aside from requiring more priming).

So... it's got to do about oil viscosity in function of oil temperature (and of course type of oil, oil pump, dilution with avgas, etc.). Does Packard Merlin have same type of oil pump as Rolls-Royce Merlin? Does it possibly use the same module in Accusim (thus automatically update the core of Spitfire)? And should we expect higher cold oil pressures to be updated for Allison engine as well in some future core update? I sure hope the oil pressure modeling would affect previous craft as well because the way it's in them is almost "on/off" type, i.e cold or warm, and the transition between them very brief.

Also the difference between winter, normal, and summer oils is just a couple of psi (literally) in a scale of 150 psi on Spitfire. Seriously? What's the point in having three oil grades if they're practically all the same? It's not just Spitfire: I start P-40 at 15 deg C and get 40 psi. I idle it with 70 deg C hot oils and still get 37 psi. (I want these super-hyper-multi-grade oils in my car! Even 5W50 fully-synthetic oils are not that unaffected by temperature.)

Anyway, I hope Mustang has the temperature-viscosity relation reworked, instead of just raising the temperature where oil becomes considered as "warm enough", so that transition would be smoother, and oil pressure drop could actually be seen throughout all the usable oil temperature range, instead of a narrow temperature region.

___

Sorry about the bashing of old products. I bash because I care. If I didn't care, I wouldn't care enough to ...care. And these are the best there is, even if they still have slight room to be perfected. Well, I dunno about Mustang... it seems to have fixed some minor issues from the products. (The only bigger issue unsolved is the pneumatic bug on Spitfire that still hasn't been solved: the pneumatic pump gets turned on start-up but doesn't turn off on shutdown, making Spitfire's pneumatic system into a perpetual motion machine that draws energy out of nowhere.)on/off


EDIT: Oh yeah, Accusim Core Update 1.31!
Quote:
v.1.3 Accu-Sim Core Update Changes
- New oil system modeling. Based on A2A independent tests on live Merlin and Allison engines. Oil pressure is slower to rise, and pressures can be extremely high with cold oil. It is very important you observe oil temperature minimum temperatures before applying full power.
- Re-coded the magneto behavior on engine power
- Accu-Sim engine performance and drag envelopes better synched with FSX flight modeling
- Mach drag removed from FSX and fully controlled via Accu-Sim core
- Adjusted fuel starvation with clogged fuel filters
- Increased Co2 power for Spitfire emergency gear
- Wear power scalar to improve control over engine life for different engine types
- Some fuel system delivery tweaks, increased fuel pump output to avoid some pre-mature fuel starvation with very high power

FIXES:
- Sometimes moving to a new airfield from being in the air would result in the gear not being lowered.
- Reduced moisture put into the air by breathing


Can't wait to test those improvements. I wonder if the re-coded magneto behavior solves the difference of power output between fuel out and magnetos off. Because in Core 1.2, if you cut the magnetos after your engine died of fuel run-out, you lost additional power you didn't even know you had.

Also, I wonder if they actually touched the pneumatic system. It's not listed on fixes list... even though it should be a quick fix since all that needs to be done is to set a trigger to shut down the air pump when prop is not spinning.

...Actually, I upgraded and testing as I type. +5 oil temperature and it's still 120 psi on the Spit instead of dropping to regular. Good. No longer a dual state "cold"/"warm" oil viscosity. The modeling actually reminds you that the oils are still barely lukewarm. Hmm... viscosity reduces even within recommended operating oil temperature region (40-80 deg C). With this oil modeling, it'd be sheer horror to take of with absolute minimum oil temperature of +15 deg C (not that I ever do it with oils cooler than +30 - the oil pressures are still quite maxed out at +40). Anyway: AWESOME. Gives some extra motivation to start up, warm, stop and restart to give oils twice the time to warm up before taking of on sub-zero temperatures.


Last edited by whiic on Mon May 28, 2012 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:42 pm 
Offline
Airman Basic

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:47 am
Posts: 2
It has a jet-like sound to it. A classic, that's for sure.


jime


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline
Airman

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:00 am
Posts: 48
Location: Germany
...the only reason that waiting for the P-51 feels easy for me is...
...I'm flying the DCS Beta in the waiting time :mrgreen:

I will LOVE to fly the P-51 in ACCUSIM FSX as well...

...and I'm pretty shure, without my previous training in DCS the A2A will kill me in the first ten tries to get the beast airborne (as it did in DCS :oops: )

It will be fun to program the Warthog Hotas EXACTLY like in DCS...

In FSX I can fly to every airport on earth with the P-51 and in DCS I can blow..., eeeh.., currently not blow stuff up, but get blown to pieces :cry:

My to most favorite SIM airplane companies build the same airplane, although FSX and DCS are incomparable by definition, comparing them alone will be FUN.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:32 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:48 am
Posts: 344
Location: Finland
On a second thought, the fuel gauges are probably mechanical and thus should have a reading (like they have). If they weren't mechanically linked to the floats in the fuel tanks, they wouldn't be positioned on the floor. (And the fuselage gauge being awkwardly positioned behind the pilot's seat...)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:33 pm 
Offline
Technical Sergeant

Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 946
Location: Holland, near EHTW
IT"S OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
Lukas
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:45 pm 
Offline
Airman First Class

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:53 am
Posts: 92
Enjoy my 50$!
So now I'm an official A2A costumer as well...

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:53 pm 
Offline
A2A Master Mechanic
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 8:45 am
Posts: 861
Location: Poland
whiic wrote:
On a second thought, the fuel gauges are probably mechanical and thus should have a reading (like they have). If they weren't mechanically linked to the floats in the fuel tanks, they wouldn't be positioned on the floor. (And the fuselage gauge being awkwardly positioned behind the pilot's seat...)
Image

;)

_________________
Chris Oleksy

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group