1. Does the 'no gun' model give a better "over-the-panel" view? All tail draggers have poor forward view on take off, but it would be nice to have a better view on landing. The plane is very unstable the last few feet of landing as it is...would be nice to have a better view of a failed landing!
2. There seems to be an enormous need for 'forward' stick in order to keep the nose down for level flight. I understand, no trim. But is there a solution?
-=dcp=-
Two questions
Re: Two questions
Hello,
The 'no gun' model offers the same view from the cockpit. This licensed-built Albatros had built-in machine guns to improve pilot's view. The 'no-gun' represents the post-World War 1 model from the 20's.
Those WW1 planes had a high incidence wings and many of them were naturally tail-heavy and had to be flown with the stick forward. The Central Powers' fighters had a kind of stick-lock utility. It is here as well. That was a kind of small lever mounted on the stick which allowed the pilot to 'lock' it in the desired position. It worked like a primitive trim/autopilot. Just press the trim key on your joystick and the stick should lock. Press it again and the stick will work again.
Regards,
Lucas
The 'no gun' model offers the same view from the cockpit. This licensed-built Albatros had built-in machine guns to improve pilot's view. The 'no-gun' represents the post-World War 1 model from the 20's.
Those WW1 planes had a high incidence wings and many of them were naturally tail-heavy and had to be flown with the stick forward. The Central Powers' fighters had a kind of stick-lock utility. It is here as well. That was a kind of small lever mounted on the stick which allowed the pilot to 'lock' it in the desired position. It worked like a primitive trim/autopilot. Just press the trim key on your joystick and the stick should lock. Press it again and the stick will work again.
Regards,
Lucas
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests