Concerned

This is the place where we can all meet and speak about whatever is on the mind.
User avatar
Ron Attwood
Chief Master Sergeant
Posts: 3248
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 10:07
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, UK

Re: Concerned

Post by Ron Attwood »

ClipperLuna wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 11:24 Was trying to indulge in light humour but I think it fell flat. I promise one of these days I'll think about my posts before sending! :wink:
Don't you hate it when that happens? :D
Eva Vlaardingerbroek, an inspiratiom.

User avatar
lonewulf47
A2A Chief Pilot
Posts: 6744
Joined: 03 Aug 2008, 10:41
Location: 1 NM east of LSZH

Re: Concerned

Post by lonewulf47 »

twsharp12 wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 07:07 When is the Comanche being released, A2A??
AFAIK the project has been dropped due to cultural appropriation...
Oskar

ASUS MAXIMUS XI Hero, i9-9900K 8 Core OC 5.2 GHz, WIN10-64Bit, 32GB DDR5, Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti Strix, 2x 2 TB SSD M.2, 1x 2 TB SSD, 1 monitor 4k, AS4, EFB on remote PC

Image

twsharp12
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 480
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 09:30

Re: Concerned

Post by twsharp12 »

Just rename the Comanche to the Commander

User avatar
ClipperLuna
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 756
Joined: 23 May 2014, 12:50
Location: KPUW

Re: Concerned

Post by ClipperLuna »

lonewulf47 wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 14:46
twsharp12 wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 07:07 When is the Comanche being released, A2A??
AFAIK the project has been dropped due to cultural appropriation...
With the state of the world being what it is, I can't tell anymore if such things are real or something out of the Babylon Bee

clarkejw
Senior Airman
Posts: 197
Joined: 14 Oct 2013, 16:29
Location: Maitland, NSW Australia

Re: Concerned

Post by clarkejw »

And, when it's all said and done, it's only a Comanche.

User avatar
Ian MC
Airman
Posts: 30
Joined: 28 Jan 2022, 11:31
Location: KLHQ

Re: Concerned

Post by Ian MC »

clarkejw wrote: 16 Nov 2022, 16:21 And, when it's all said and done, it's only a Comanche.
ONLY a Comanche? ONLY?! That's blasphemy, Sir; The Comanche is wonderful, they couldn't have started with a better plane. :P

Bones
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 292
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 19:34

Re: Concerned

Post by Bones »

I'm planning on bringing up the lack of a Comanche in MSFS during the airing of grievances at our Festivus celebration. I blame everyone.

twsharp12
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 480
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 09:30

Re: Concerned

Post by twsharp12 »

Could have started with the P-51. That would have been better.

User avatar
ClipperLuna
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 756
Joined: 23 May 2014, 12:50
Location: KPUW

Re: Concerned

Post by ClipperLuna »

twsharp12 wrote: 17 Nov 2022, 12:54 Could have started with the P-51. That would have been better.
You'll get no argument from me. Of course, the initial, ground attack version of this plane was called the Apache, so . . . (?)

User avatar
Ron Attwood
Chief Master Sergeant
Posts: 3248
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 10:07
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, UK

Re: Concerned

Post by Ron Attwood »

twsharp12 wrote: 17 Nov 2022, 12:54 Could have started with the P-51. That would have been better.
How would NOT getting the P-51 be better than NOT getting the Comanche? :roll:
Eva Vlaardingerbroek, an inspiratiom.

twsharp12
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 480
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 09:30

Re: Concerned

Post by twsharp12 »

The mustang could be offensive to the equestrian community.
Ron Attwood wrote: 17 Nov 2022, 14:50
twsharp12 wrote: 17 Nov 2022, 12:54 Could have started with the P-51. That would have been better.
How would NOT getting the P-51 be better than NOT getting the Comanche? :roll:
:lol:

MarcE
Senior Master Sergeant
Posts: 1657
Joined: 27 Jun 2009, 03:39
Location: Southern Germany
Contact:

Re: Concerned

Post by MarcE »

twsharp12 wrote: 17 Nov 2022, 15:24 The mustang could be offensive to the equestrian community.
I had to look after that word… and think 2.. 3 times about it… man… 😅😅😅😅😅

User avatar
MkIV Hvd
A2A Mechanic
Posts: 1222
Joined: 11 Mar 2019, 21:36
Location: CYYC

Re: Concerned

Post by MkIV Hvd »

Ron Attwood wrote: 17 Nov 2022, 14:50
twsharp12 wrote: 17 Nov 2022, 12:54 Could have started with the P-51. That would have been better.
How would NOT getting the P-51 be better than NOT getting the Comanche? :roll:
Dammit Ron, it's about hope!! Have you no heart man!!????!! :roll:
I too would prefer to not have the Civ Mustang... :mrgreen:

Cheers,
Rob
Rob Wilkinson
A2A: Civilian Mustang, T-6, Bonanza, Comanche, Cub, C182, Spitfire, P-40, Cherokee, P-51 - VATSIM P4 and some other stuff...

User avatar
Styggron
Master Sergeant
Posts: 1031
Joined: 30 Oct 2015, 14:28

Re: Concerned

Post by Styggron »

I'm sticking with FSX as that is where my A2A and Aircraft Factory planes are. I see no reason to move to FSXI. For me at least, it's about the planes and only the planes not so much the sim. Of course a better "simulation" and scenery is nice and all that but I just adore my B377/COTS and Spitfire. Not ever giving those up.

:)
Accufeel V2, C172 , B377+L049+COTS, B17G, Piper Cub,Commanche,Cherrokee,Spitfire,Bonanza, P47,P40,both Mustangs
Aircraft Factory Avro Anson, Albatros DIII,Heinkel He-219, F4U Corsair, P51H Mustang, Avro 504, BF109
Watch my incompetent flying Twitch

new reply

Return to “Pilot's Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 109 guests